Conflict Prevention, Peace Building and Mediation – EC Library Guide
Selected publications
Selected EU publications
-
CORDIS results pack on insights into extremism
European Research Council Executive Agency (European Commission), European Research Executive Agency (European Commission), Publications Office of the European Union, 2024.
The EU was established with the aim to provide common ground, literally and metaphorically, for its members to thrive in a stable and secure environment, being ‘united in diversity.’ The emergence of violent extremism, populism and radicalisation undermines European cohesion, unsettling the Union’s foundations and fostering insecurity among its citizens.
-
Dawn or doom? – The new AU mission in Somalia and the fight for stability
European Union Institute for Security Studies and Marangio, R., Dawn or doom? – The new AU mission in Somalia and the fight for stability, Publications Office of the European Union, 2025, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2815/5298924
The newly established African Union Support and Stabilisation Mission in Somalia (AUSSOM) is already facing financial uncertainty. Hopes of securing UN funding – and piloting a new model for supporting African peace operations – are fading, thwarted by likely American obstructionism. Despite two decades of progress, Somalia remains fragile as it struggles with terrorism and unresolved political disputes between Mogadishu and federal member states. Yet the country’s strategic location makes its stability crucial for Gulf countries, the EU, Türkiye and even the US. Disjointed donor strategies threaten to undermine state-building efforts, exacerbating internal strife. The EU and the AU must redouble their efforts to rally international backers around a cohesive, multilateral approach – lest Somalia’s precarious progress be undone. -
EU emergency trust fund for Africa – 2023 annual report
European Commission, Directorate-General for International Partnerships, Publications Office of the European Union, 2024.
The EU Emergency Trust Fund for Africa (EUTF for Africa) was set up to support the most vulnerable and marginalised people, including refugees, internally displaced people, migrants and members of host communities. Over the last 8 years, it has provided great momentum for a coordinated response by the European Union, its Member States and other donors to multiple challenges across the Sahel and Lake Chad, Horn of Africa and North of Africa regions. In 2023, the three regions of the EUTF for Africa were marked by political crisis - with regime changes in the Sahel region – and armed conflict, like in the case of Sudan where in April violence broke out between Sudanese Armed Forces and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces.
The effects of Russia’s war of aggression in Ukraine, economic hardship aggravated by high inflation, and the increasingly devastating impact of climate change were all factors that contributed to deteriorating the livelihoods of the most vulnerable populations in Africa. In this context, and despite the winding down of many projects, the EUTF for Africa continued to demonstrate its capacity to support the most vulnerable and marginalised people across its four Strategic objectives: greater economic and employment opportunities; strengthening resilience of communities; improved migration management; and improved governance and conflict prevention. Thanks to the close cooperation with EU Member States and African partner countries, the EUTF for Africa continued to foster dialogue and coordination on migration and forced displacement with the aim to address their root causes and promote stability.
-
EU emergency trust fund for Africa – 2024 annual report
European Commission: Directorate-General for International Partnerships, EU emergency trust fund for Africa – 2024 annual report, Publications Office of the European Union, 2025, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2841/9152535
The European Union (EU) Emergency Trust Fund for Africa (EUTF for Africa) was set up to support the most vulnerable and marginalised people, including refugees, internally displaced persons (IDPs), migrants and members of host communities. Over the last nine years, it has provided great momentum for a coordinated response by the EU, its Member States and other donors to multiple challenges across the Sahel and Lake Chad, Horn of Africa and North of Africa regions. In 2024, the three regions of the EUTF for Africa were marked by political crises – with regime changes in the Sahel region – and armed conflict, like the ongoing civil war in Sudan which is causing the largest displacement crisis in the world. The continued repercussions of Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, economic hardship aggravated by high inflation, and the increasingly devastating impact of climate change further contributed to deteriorating the livelihoods of the most vulnerable populations in Africa.
-
The EU polyhedral mediation in Sub-Saharan Africa
Antoni Sastre Bel, European University Institute, 2024.
Since 2007, the EU has been investing heavily in advancing peace and security in the African continent, by supporting the African peace and security architecture institutions. Until now most of this support has been concentrated in crisis management and defence capacity building. Nevertheless this approach hasn’t delivered the effects it intended. As a consequence, other conflict prevention and resolution instruments that could be more cost-efficient and less coercive, such as peace mediation, have been under-exploited. In front of this conundrum, this thesis researches on the EU engagement in conflict mediation in sub-Saharan Africa, in order to identify the strengths, weaknesses and opportunities for improvement. For this purpose, it uses the analytical framework of ‘multi-mediation’ developed by Davis (2018) and applies it into the cases studies of the Ethiopia-Tigray War and the current conflict in Sudan. After analysing them, the research concludes presenting how the EU is well-equipped to perform mediation support in the African continent and recommends to reinforce its normative approach to mediation.
-
European Peace Facility – For Ukraine, but not only
Briefing, European Parliament, 2025.
The European Peace Facility (EPF) was created in March 2021 as a funding instrument aimed at enhancing the EU's ability to prevent conflicts, build and preserve peace, and strengthen international security and stability. The EPF rests on two pillars. The first is to fund EU military operations and missions under the common foreign and security policy. The second is to provide assistance to countries in the EU's eastern neighbourhood, the Middle East and Africa to strengthen security in their respective regions. Following Russia's all-out invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the EU started using the EPF to rapidly deliver military aid to Ukraine. This support was provided alongside continued assistance to the EU's eastern neighbourhood, as well as to partners in the Middle East and Africa. The EPF has a total financial ceiling of more than €17 billion for the 2021-2027 period.
As the facility is an off-budget instrument, EU Member States contribute directly to it, based on the gross national income key. Currently, the EPF lacks fresh resources to continue supporting Ukraine in facing the war. Furthermore, since March 2023, Hungary has refused to mobilise EPF funds in military aid to Ukraine. In line with the sanctions imposed on Russia in 2022, Russian assets held in EU banks were frozen. In May 2024, the Council of the EU allocated 90 % of the 'windfall' (extraordinary) profits from these frozen assets to the EPF. A first transfer of €1.5 billion from these profits to Ukraine took place in mid-2024. A second payment, possibly amounting to €2 billion, is expected in spring 2025. Given Hungary's veto, the EU is looking for more reliable ways to continue assistance to Ukraine than by means of the windfall profits from the Russian assets channelled through the EPF. On 24 October 2024, the EU created the Ukraine Loan Cooperation Mechanism (ULCM) and issued an exceptional macro-financial assistance loan of €18.1 billion, the EU's part of an EU-G7 syndicated loan to Ukraine totalling €45 billion. Starting after March 2025, 95 % of the windfall profits from the Russian assets held in EU banks will be allocated to the EU budget and channelled through the ULCM to Ukraine. The remaining 5 % will be allocated to the EPF. Beyond Ukraine, for which the EPF-funded approved military support amounts to approximately €10.6 billion, the EPF has an available budget of €6.4 billion to fund, until 2027, both the common costs of EU military missions and operations abroad – including its military assistance mission in support of Ukraine – and assistance measures for the armed forces of partner countries.
-
EUTF thematic evaluation on strengthening resilience of vulnerable and displacement affected communities in the Horn of Africa – Final report. Volume 1
European Commission: Directorate-General for International Partnerships, ECDPM, Particip, tana, Hauck, V. et al., EUTF thematic evaluation on strengthening resilience of vulnerable and displacement affected communities in the Horn of Africa – Final report. Volume 1, Publications Office of the European Union, 2025, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2841/8749639
This report presents the findings, conclusions, lessons and recommendations of the European Union Trust Fund (EUTF) Thematic Evaluation on Strengthening Resilience of Vulnerable and Displacement Affected Communities in the Horn of Africa (HoA). The study was commissioned by the European Commission’s Directorate-General for International Partnerships (DG INTPA) with the aim of providing an overall independent assessment of the results achieved and lessons learnt in the HoA in relation to the second strategic objective of the European Union Emergency Trust Fund for stability and addressing root causes of irregular migration and displaced persons in Africa (2015-2025).
The second strategic objective (SO2) aimed to strengthen the resilience of the most vulnerable sections of society, including refugees and displaced persons. The evaluation focused on the HoA countries which received most support from the EUTF, namely Ethiopia, Kenya, Sudan, Somalia, South Sudan and Uganda. It also examined cross-border interventions. Temporally, the evaluation looked at interventions from the start of the EUTF in 2016 up until 2024. During this period, approximately EUR 756 million in contracted funding was allocated to resilience interventions in the HoA region. Throughout the EUTF implementation period, the HoA region experienced major challenges including civil wars, political instability, natural disasters, the effects of Covid-19 and persistent poverty. These challenges underscored the pertinence of the EUTF’s resilience support, although it also presented challenges to a smooth implementation. Against this background, the evaluation assessed the extent to which the EUTF contributed to improved food security and natural resource management, strengthened disaster and conflict risk management (DRM) and social cohesion among Internally Displaced People (IDPs), refugees and host communities. It also identified obstacles and opportunities for sustainability, reviewed the effectiveness and efficiency of project delivery and assessed the overall added value of the EUTF’s support to the region. The evaluation was carried out in 2024 and included missions to Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia, South Sudan and Uganda. Support to Sudan and to cross-border regions was investigated remotely. A mixed methods approach for data collection and analysis was deployed embracing nearly 250 semi-structured interviews, 39 focus group discussions (during which 315 people participated), documentation review, a targeted e-survey, quantitative (financial) reviews of project portfolios and direct observation through project visits (to the extent feasible, given security and logistical constraints).
-
Guidance notes on conflict sensitivity no. 13 on – Disarmament, Demobilisation and Reintegration (DDR) – A complement to the 2015 EU Staff Handbook on Operating in Situations of Conflict and Fragility, Tools and Methods Series, reference document no. 17
European Commission: Directorate-General for International Partnerships, Guidance notes on conflict sensitivity no. 13 on – Disarmament, Demobilisation and Reintegration (DDR) – A complement to the 2015 EU Staff Handbook on Operating in Situations of Conflict and Fragility, Tools and Methods Series, reference document no. 17, Publications Office of the European Union, 2024.
This document aims to provide thematic guidance on how to take into account key conflict sensitivity issues when supporting processes related to Disarmament, Demobilisation and Reintegration (DDR). It presents general background as well as key conflict sensitivity dimensions when designing or managing support of DDR. The questions at the end of the document draw attention to specific conflict sensitivity considerations, including measures to address and prevent conflict risks and risks of doing harm. They may be used in various discussions, particularly during the design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of DDR-related support or programmes. This note should be read in conjunction with the rest of the EU’s thematic guidance notes on Conflict Sensitivity (Conflict Prevention and Peacebuilding; Gender; Democracy and Human Rights; Working with National Actors; Working with International Actors; Economic Development and Employment; Climate Change, Environment and Natural Resources; Food Security and Sustainable Agriculture; COVID 19; Education), as well as the new Guidance Note on SSR.
-
Guidance notes on conflict sensitivity no. 14 on – Security Sector Reform (SSR) – A complement to the 2015 EU Staff Handbook on Operating in Situations of Conflict and Fragility, Tools and Methods Series, reference document no. 17
European Commission: Directorate-General for International Partnerships, Guidance notes on conflict sensitivity no. 14 on – Security Sector Reform (SSR) – A complement to the 2015 EU Staff Handbook on Operating in Situations of Conflict and Fragility, Tools and Methods Series, reference document no. 17, Publications Office of the European Union, 2024.
This document aims to provide thematic guidance on how to consider key conflict sensitivity issues when supporting processes related to Security Sector Reform (SSR). The questions at the end of the document draw attention to specific conflict sensitivity considerations, calling for measures to mitigate conflict risks and risks of doing harm. These may be used in the various discussions, particularly during the design and appraisal phase of SSR support and other interventions in support of (actors in) the security sector of partner countries. This note should be read in conjunction with the rest of the EU’s thematic guidance notes on Conflict Sensitivity (Conflict Prevention and Peacebuilding; Gender; Democracy and Human Rights; Working with National Actors; Working with International Actors; Economic Development and Employment; Climate Change, Environment and Natural Resources; Food Security and Sustainable Agriculture; COVID 19; Education), as well as the new Guidance Note on Conflict Sensitive DDR.
-
Interim evaluation of the implementation of Decision No 1313/2013/EU on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism, 2017-2022
European Commission: Directorate-General for European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations (ECHO), van der Velden, M., Enria, N., Furci, V., Esteves, S. et al., Interim evaluation of the implementation of Decision No 1313/2013/EU on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism, 2017-2022, Publications Office of the European Union, 2024.
This interim evaluation of the implementation and performance of Decision No 1313/2013/EU on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM) was commissioned by the European Commission’s Directorate-General for European Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid Operations (DG ECHO). The UCPM aims to strengthen cooperation between European Union (EU) Member States and Participating States on civil protection in order to improve prevention, preparedness and response to disasters. The evaluation assessed the effectiveness, relevance, efficiency, coherence, and EU added value of the UCPM, identified lessons, and provided strategic and operational recommendations.
Overall, it found that UCPM activities in the field of prevention, preparedness, and response contributed to achieving the Decision's objectives. Despite a notable increase in UCPM activations between 2017 and 2022 – driven by the emergence of new and more frequent disasters – the UCPM has successfully adapted to changing pressures and demands, consistently maintaining a high response rate and contributing to effective support to international response efforts. Together with the European Civil Protection Pool (ECPP), the establishment of rescEU was a key development that strengthened EU and national preparedness. The evaluation also identified a number of challenges impacting the UCPM, such as the evolving disaster risk landscape and the need to strengthen cross-sectoral cooperation at national and EU level.
-
JRC statistical audit of the INFORM Risk index
Lagüera González, J. and Smallenbroek, O., JRC statistical audit of the INFORM Risk index, Publications Office of the European Union, 2024, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/8518303
The main aim of INFORM Risk is to provide information on the risk of countries to humanitarian crises caused by hazards and people’s exposure to them including all main type of natural and human hazards, vulnerability and resources available to help people cope. The Competence Centre on Composite Indicators and Scoreboards (COIN) of the Joint Research Centre (JRC) was invited by the developers to audit the index.
The aim of the audit is to help ensure the transparency of the methodology and the reliability of its results by focusing on data quality, the statistical soundness of the multi-level structure, and the impact of key modelling assumptions. The INFORM risk index provides information on the risks of humanitarian crises and disasters on country level across the globe. This year, the 2024 version of the index is composed by 74 indicators and covers 191 countries across the world. JRC-COIN concludes the INFORM Risk index is an adequate representation of most of the underlying data by examining the structural coherence of correlations and Principle Component Analysis. The JRC-COIN team has identified some areas for further improvement that the developers could consider such as the statistical coherence of certain aggregates in the index. The JRC-COIN team suggests some small changes which developers could test to improve the statistical coherence. Lastly, the analysis shows that the scores and risk categories reliably reflect a wide range of scenarios and are robust to certain methodological alterations, including the imputation method, aggregation formulas and weighting.
-
The looming risk of World War III
European University Institute and Akita, H., The looming risk of World War III, European University Institute, 2024.
This paper analyses the risk of a Third World War. Although conflicts are taking place in many parts of the world, many people may not feel there is much of a threat. However, if one observes reality dispassionately, the view that the risk of a Third World War is looming is not necessarily unrealistic. First, let us look back at the history of the great wars mainly in Europe since the end of the 18th century: the Napoleonic Wars, the Crimean War, the Franco-Prussian War, the First World War and the Second World War. The longest interwar period was 43 years between the Franco-Prussian War and the First World War, this is followed by 39 years between the Napoleon War and the Crimean War. Conversely, the shortest interwar period was that between the Franco-Prussian War and the First World War, which lasted only 14 years. By comparison, since the Second World War ended in 1945, the international community has not experienced a major war for almost 80 years, despite the Cold War between the U.S. and the Soviet Union. Looking back at modern history, the 80 years of peace after 1945 should be considered unusual.
-
Mapping threats to peace and democracy worldwide – Normandy index 2024
European Parliament: Directorate-General for Parliamentary Research Services, Lazarou, E., Bassot, E. and Stanicek, B., Mapping threats to peace and democracy worldwide – Normandy index 2024, Bassot, E.(editor), European Parliament, 2024.
Conflict is rarely confined to the geographical space in which wars take place. The increasingly global effects – human, material and political – of wars and conflicts make a view of the level of threats to peace, security and democracy around the world more important than ever. The 'Normandy Index' has presented an annual measurement of these threats since the 2019 Normandy Peace Forum. The results of the 2024 exercise suggest the level of threats to peace is the highest since the Index began, confirming declining trends in global security resulting from conflict, geopolitical rivalry, growing militarisation and hybrid threats. The findings of the 2024 exercise draw on data compiled in 2023-2024 to compare peace – defined on the basis of a given country's performance against a range of predetermined threats – across countries and regions.
A series of 63 individual country case studies To complete the picture of the state of peace today. Designed and prepared by the European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS), in conjunction with and on the basis of data provided by the Institute for Economics and Peace, the Normandy Index is produced in partnership with the Region of Normandy. The paper forms part of the EPRS contribution to the 2024 Normandy World Peace Forum.
-
The power and limits of data for peace – Improving the EU conflict early warning system for more effective prevention
European Union Institute for Security Studies and Bressan, S., The power and limits of data for peace – Improving the EU conflict early warning system for more effective prevention, Publications Office of the European Union, 2024.
This Brief analyses the EU warning system’s contribution to conflict prevention and discusses ways to strengthen it. The first section examines the factors that contribute to the success of the system. The second section suggests how the system and the EU’s overall prevention approach can be further improved. Both sections hold lessons for developers of risk assessment and warning systems within and outside EU institutions. The Brief concludes by arguing that the European External Action Service (EEAS) should focus on expanding the methodological toolbox to include innovative foresight approaches. Together with the EU Commission, Member States and other partners, it should strengthen the link between warning and action to make sure analyses translate into meaningful, coordinated prevention.
-
Strengthening EU-Moldova cooperation – Challenges and perspectives in the transnistrian settlement process
European University Institute and Condratiuc, M., Strengthening EU-Moldova cooperation – Challenges and perspectives in the transnistrian settlement process, European University Institute, 2024.
This paper focuses on the importance of the negotiation process for the settlement of the Transnistrian conflict and the potential for Moldova's EU membership as the main policy options in preventing an escalation of the conflict and in preserving peace and security in Europe. It provides an overview of the current condition of the existing negotiating formats and their capacity to address the issues hindering the interaction of Chisinau and Tiraspol in the negotiation process. It also explores the possibilities of resetting and adapting certain formats in the light of Moldova's progress in the process of integration into the European Union, in order to focus more on peace and security issues that threaten regional stability. The text highlights the areas where Moldova needs more EU support and expertise to bring the Transnistrian region back into the state's legal framework, thereby creating favourable conditions for conflict resolution and subsequently for Moldova's reintegration and EU integration processes.
-
Strengthening the women, peace and security agenda
European Parliament: Directorate-General for Citizens’ Rights, Justice and Institutional Affairs, Sandu, G. and Ambrosio, I., Strengthening the women, peace and security agenda, European Parliament, 2025, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2861/3368969
United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325/2000 (UNSCR 1325) is the first UN resolution which addresses the disproportionate impact of armed conflict on women. It stresses the need for women’s equal and meaningful participation as active agents in the prevention and resolution of conflicts, peace negotiations, peace building, peacekeeping, humanitarian response and in post-conflict reconstruction. It also reaffirms the importance of international humanitarian and human rights law in the protection of women and their rights. UNSCR 1325 has been complemented by nine other resolutions on women, peace and security (WPS).
The WPS agenda is central to contemporary global peace and security challenges. Over the years, the WPS agenda has evolved to address the complex intersection of gender, peace, and security, reflecting a broader understanding of how women's experiences in conflict impact their societies and how their inclusion in peace processes contributes to long-term stability. While progress has been made, the continued evolution of the WPS agenda reflects ongoing efforts to tackle systemic barriers and ensure that women’s voices are heard and their contributions are fully recognized in shaping global peace and security. The WPS agenda is based on the following pillars: participation, prevention, protection, relief and recovery.
-
Sufficiently just peace Bridging the normative gap between an ideal conception of justice and a non-ideal reality in Ukraine
Sami James Harju, European University Institute, 2024.
The following attempts to determine the extent to which formulating a rational endgame in Ukraine might benefit from the presented conceptual framing of a sufficiently just peace. While Ukraine must be supported in dictating the terms of its own future in the face of malevolence, the current trajectory of the conflict forbodes no good outcome for anyone. The gulf between the generally held maximal conception of an ideal justice and any pragmatic outlook of peace presents a dangerously incompatible normative contrast. The proposed framework utilises relevant principles from both just war and just peace theory, bringing them back to reality through an enhanced utility in contextualisation.
The proposed paradigm subsequently facilitates conflicting narratives, intersubjectivity, and compromise, with the added scope of treating both peace and justice as relative conditions. The sufficient condition that guide the use of the framework, while informed by context, are largely subjective and open to interpretation. The analysis serves as a dialectical summary of the historical context causes, and potential consequences of the war, upon which the framework can be utilised by the reader to determine their own 'sufficiently just peace'.
-
Syria, country focus report – Country of origin information report – October 2024
European Union Agency for Asylum, Syria, country focus report – Country of origin information report – October 2024, Publications Office of the European Union, 2024, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2847/3595713
The purpose of this report is to provide relevant information for the assessment of applications for international protection, including refugee status and subsidiary protection, and in particular for use in updating EUAA’s country guidance document on Syria. The report covers the period of September 2023 – August 2024, and provides a limited update of selected sections previously addressed in the EUAA COI reports: Syria – Country Focus (October 2023), Syria - Targeting of individuals (September 2022) as well as an update of the EUAA COI report: Syria - Socio-economic situation in Damascus city (September 2022). This report should be read in conjunction with the EUAA COI report: Syria – Security situation (October 2024).
- Last Updated: Sep 11, 2025 12:23 PM
- URL: https://ec-europa-eu.libguides.com/conflict-prevention
- Print Page